Squid vs nginx vs varnish. I used to use Apache, but NGINX...

Squid vs nginx vs varnish. I used to use Apache, but NGINX is lighter, faster, easier, and these days it does everything I need from a webserver. But how do they compare? Which one is right for your web service? Forward vs reverse proxies Varnish and Squid have fundamentally different caching architectures. Comparison of Squid vs. I have used HAProxy in load balancing scenarios, where I think it's more appropriate than for reverse proxy. Robustness and Resilience Cost Efficiency Flexibility and Control Detailed Analytics and Logging Who is Varnish For Comparing Varnish with Other Caching Solutions Varnish vs Squid Varnish vs Nginx Varnish vs Apache Traffic Server How to Install and Configure Varnish Ubuntu: CentOS: Default Configuration Tips for Configuring Varnish Using VCL Squid、Varnish 和 Nginx 是三种流行的代理服务器软件，它们在 Linux 系统中用于缓存、反向代理和负载均衡。下面是它们的一些区别和特点： Squid 类型：Squid 是一个高度可配置的代理服务器和缓存服务器，主要用于HTTP、HTTPS、FTP和更多协议。 工作原理：Squid Nginx can act both as a caching proxy server and a regular web server, making it a more adaptable choice for different use cases. 毛伟 什么都略懂一点，生活就多彩一些 39 人赞同了该回答 squid 是缓存服务器科班出生 varnish 是觉得squid性能不行，纯内存缓存服务器方案 nginx cache 是属于不务正业，得益于nginx强大的性能 发布于 2013-03-20 01:26 查看剩余 12 条回答 Proxy Varnish vs Nginx: A Deep Dive for Peak Web Performance By bomber bot September 27, 2024 In the fast-paced world of web development and delivery, performance is king. However, for multiple sites, things like the lack of pipelining in Nginx will hurt you, so Squid would be the better choice in that case. Websites with a lot of traffic and high prominence have implemented Varnish. Squid is a forward proxy that can be configured as a reverse proxy, while Varnish is built specifically to be a reverse proxy and HTTP accelerator. Squid was more built for a normal proxy service and not a reverse proxy. With the development momentum and user base behind NGINX, as well as the performance and reliability, I usually go NGINX. Varnish in 2024 by cost, reviews, features, integrations, deployment, target market, support options, trial offers, training options, years in business, region, and more using the chart below. Use the comparison view below to compare Squid and NGINX by pricing, user ratings and reviews, supported platforms, features, company information, geography, and more. Archived post. Depending on your server set up, you may want to look at some Squid Proxy Servers with similar capabilities. In this post, we will introduce both Varnish and Nginx then compare them both with their respective pros and cons. Compare price, features, and reviews of the software side-by-side to make the best choice for your business. 0 Discover how Squid, the high-performance caching proxy server, can revolutionize your web acceleration and content delivery. Recently came across an article on using AWS CloudFront to deliver the whole site, instead of using Varnish as reverse proxy. In terms of security, it has authorization, access control, authentication, and support for SSL/TLS. But it is an add-on and limited in functionality compared to a purpose-built solution like Varnish. Compare Varnish and Squid - features, pros, cons, and real-world usage from developers. Squid Caching Proxy — A popular and widely adopted proxy and caching solution for network protocols. - Soyn/nginx-quick-reference. If you're just running a single site without any complex requirements, you'll probably be better off with Nginx. This distinction is crucial when choosing a web cache server, as it directly impacts performance and scalability. Varnish gives you access to very detailed logs that are useful when debugging problems. Learn about their history, architecture, functionalities, strengths, and limitations in today's web environment. Know more. Squid in 2025 by cost, reviews, features, integrations, deployment, target market, support options, trial offers, training options, years in business, region, and more using the chart below. Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. But how can you choose the best page caching solution for your WordPress website? NGINX is an Open Source and Commercial software-based web server that can be used as a load balancer, mail proxy, reverse proxy and HTTP cache. How to improve NGINX performance, security, and other important things. As mentioned in the introduction, many NGINX vs Varnish comparisons on the internet take a general “web-serving” view. 7k次。本文对比了Squid、Varnish和Nginx三种反向代理服务器的特点及优势。Squid历史悠久但配置复杂；Varnish高性能，支持多核，但缺乏自动容错功能；Nginx支持高并发连接，内存消耗少，配置简单，稳定性高。 Both products have evolved quite a bit in that time (including a major rewrite in C++ for Squid). NGINX in 2025 Compare Squid and NGINX to understand the differences and make the best choice. However, NGINX tends to deviate from its roots as a web server, offering a broader set of features including an HTTP cache. Compare Traefik vs. Sure they work today and are probably totally reasonable, but what happens when nginx releases a new version that breaks it for some unknown reason – can expect that module to be updated by the time I'm ready to update my nginx version? Apples to apples though, haproxy has those features baked in and nginx doesn't. Проект связан с социальными сетями и нагрузка может возрастать с 10-20 до 100 Мбит/с за 1-2 минуты. 文章浏览阅读2. Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Users expect lightning-fast websites and applications, and even a slight delay can lead to frustration, abandonment, and lost revenue. Varnish Cache has 19552 and Squid Cache has 68 customers in Web And Application Servers industry. Unlike Varnish, Nginx and Apache TS have the ability to use SSL termination. The ACL/rules for varnish are easy to use and build where squid i'm not sure if they adapted to something like this yet. 本文对比了Linux运维中常用的Web缓存服务器方案，包括Varnish、Squid和Nginx。Varnish速度快但容量有限，适合小文件缓存；Squid功能全面但性能一般，适合大文件缓存；Nginx性能接近Varnish，适合静态文件缓存。 Compare nginx vs Varnish. From the Varnish FAQ: Does that mean I can't use Varnish as a forward proxy? You can, but you probably don't want to. Compare Squid and Varnish Software head-to-head across pricing, user satisfaction, and features, using data from actual users. Nginx vs Varnish? If given the task to speed up a website like this by placing a caching proxy in front of it, would you go for Varnish, or Nginx? The current bottleneck is CPU usage on the apache webserver. Varnish - High-performance HTTP accelerator. com/jiangwenyuan/nuster/wiki/Web-cache-server-performance-benchmark%3A-nuster-vs-nginx-vs-varnish-vs-squid Has anyone used it? I would love some feedbacks. Is it really better than Varnish, especially in case of Magento? 文章浏览阅读1. Our crowd-sourced lists contains more than 10 apps similar to Varnish for Linux, Mac, Windows, Self-Hosted and more. Compare Varnish vs Squid. New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast. However, the main use case for NGINX is still being a web ser Mar 28, 2025 · We compare and contrast three industry giants: Varnish Cache, Apache Traffic Server, and Squid Cache. Nonetheless, after a quick perusal of the docs for Varnish, I can say that for pretty much everything Varnish can do, Squid generally has three or four different tactics built in for approaching the same problem. Kong vs Squid: What are the differences? Introduction Kong and Squid are both popular proxy servers that serve distinct purposes in the realm of web communication and security. Squid has a method to utilize local storage for caching, varnish does too but varnish just seems to do a better job with it while its in memory. 文章浏览阅读560次。SquidCache，简称Squid，是一款广泛使用的开源HTTP代理服务器。它能够缓存Internet数据，提高网络访问速度，降低带宽消耗。Squid支持多种缓存策略，并且可以与其他网络服务如Nginx配合使用，提供更高效的网络解决方案。 Compare Squid vs. In my experience varnish is much faster than squid, but equally importantly it's much less of a black box than squid is. 7 Varnish really isn't meant to be a general purpose web cache like Squid. Configuration Language: Varnish uses its own domain-specific language called VCL (Varnish Configuration Language) for configuration, which is specific to Varnish and requires learning a new syntax. As a bonus, you get activity logs. However, Squid Proxy is not for content caching and traffic forwarding. 8k次。本文对比分析了Varnish、Squid和Nginx作为缓存服务的功能特性，重点介绍了Varnish在内存利用上的优势及Nginx在静态文件缓存中的应用。同时，探讨了Apache服务如何提升性能并指出使用Apache作为缓存服务的不适宜性。 Example: Varnish Cache, Squid Proxy. My personal favourite is Squid, which I have been using for over 10 years, both as a forward proxy and a reverse proxy, but many people rave about Varnish: which proxy cache you choose depends on the exact caching requirements. Server-Side Cache: Stores generated HTML to avoid repeated computation. Squid operates in a similar way to Varnish and optimizes data flow between the client and server. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones. Apache Traffic Server - RFC compliant, high performance HTTP proxy cache. Compare Varnish Cache vs Squid Cache 2025. i don't know how many kids you got running around the house but they have limited use to the average self hoster / home labber. Varnish using this comparison chart. Mar 9, 2020 · Varnish excels in high-performance content delivery, Squid is versatile for general proxying and caching, and Nginx serves as a flexible web server and reverse proxy with caching capabilities. Reverse proxy: Squid VS nginx? Выбираю между двумя сервисами на роль кеширующего прокси. The best Varnish alternatives are nginx, Squid and BunkerWeb. It is made to be an HTTP accelerator and may function as a reverse proxy for your Apache or NGINX web server. Squid VS Varnish Squid and Varnish are both powerful caching solutions, but they cater to different use cases. For example, an activity of 9. Traefik Mesh vs. Squid is more versatile with support for multiple protocols and strong SSL capabilities, while Varnish is optimized for high-performance HTTP caching with advanced caching strategies. 但是本身不支持特性挺多，只能缓存静态文件 2）从这些功能上。 varnish和squid是专业的cache服务，而nginx这些是第三方模块完成 3）varnish本身的技术上优势要高于squid，它采用了可视化页面缓存技术 在内存的利用上，Varnish比Squid具有优势，性能要比Squid高。 Check out Apache Traffic Server rankings and market share, discover who is using Apache Traffic Server, view usage statistics, and find the best alternatives. Key differences between them include: Squid operates in a similar way to Varnish and optimizes data flow between the client and server. Side-by-side analysis of features, pricing, pros and cons to help you choose the best option for your needs. Know more about varnish cache vs NGINX reverse proxy and how it impacts the website performance in this detailed post. The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives. linux运维中，web cache server方案的部署是一个很重要的环节，选择也有很多种比如：varnish、squid、nginx。下面就对当下常用的这几个web cache server做一对比： 1）从功能上说：varnish和squid是专业的cache服务，而nginx的cache功 Seems it’s built on top of haproxy, claims to be fully compatible with haproxy, and very fast according to https://github. Growth - month over month growth in stars. After reading this article, we know the difference between Squid Proxy and Nginx (Squid Proxy vs Nginx), along with some of their advantages and disadvantages (Pros and Cons). Firstly, caching is important for fast loading of your website. Despite its roots in web serving, NGINX is extremely versatile delivering various protocols and as a result supports a broad range of use cases. You can also configure Apache TS to use multiple DNS servers to match the site’s security configuration, verifying that clients are authenticated before they can access content from the cache. Varnish可以支持更多的并发连接。 因为Varnish的TCP连接与释放比Squid快，所以在高并发连接情况下可以支持更多的TCP连接。 Varnish可以通过管理端口来管理缓存，使用正则表达式就可以批量清除部分缓存，而Squid做不到这一点。 当然，和传统的Squid相比，Varnish也有 测评对象 squid —— nginx —— haproxy —— varnish 简单的安装、测试、查看相关文档后，发现nginx、haproxy一般是作为反向代理，做正向代理性能与squid差距较大，无测试意义 varnish无法做正向代理，因为所有的后端服务器都要在配置文件的设置好。 文章浏览阅读3. 5k次。本文主要对比了Linux运维中常用的web cache server，如varnish、squid、nginx，分析了它们的功能、性能等特点。还探讨了构建高性能缓存服务器的关键技术因素，以及CDN方案的实现，包括使用CDN的好处、供应商，对比了squid、varnish、Nginx+memcache三种方案并给出推荐。 What’s the difference between Squid and Varnish? Compare Squid vs. It caters for FTP, HTTP, and HTTPS. well, technically, varnish and squid are not reverse proxies, they're caching solutions. Hardware-Level Caching :zap: This notes describes how to improve Nginx performance, security and other important things; ssllabs A+ 100%. Let’s start with Top 20 Best Squid Proxy Alternatives for Linux / Windows systems. Learn about its features, benefits, and how it compares to other caching solutions in this comprehensive guide. Compare Nginx and Squid side-by-side on market share, pricing, popularity by country, and top sites using them. Configure Squid Proxy to filter web content on predefined rules and policies. A proxy server with an emphasis on HTTP caching is Varnish. - trimstray/nginx-admins-handbook Squid has more features and scales better, but Nginx is faster in simple cases. Varnish cache and NGINX cache are the reverse proxy mechanism that helps to speed up the website. Doing it requires significant amounts of DNS magic and a huge Varnish VCL file. Squid、Varnish和Nginx均为代理服务器，可缓存数据提升访问效率。Nginx以反向代理为主，缓存功能有限；Varnish与Squid为专业缓存服务，Varnish内存利用高效、速度快，Squid技术资料丰富，应用广泛。 In this article we will discuss Varnish cache NGINX reverse proxy and how you can set it up. Sep 17, 2025 · From a functional perspective, Varnish and Squid are professional service caches, while Nginx’s caching capabilities are provided by third-party modules. The best thing you can do is benchmarking both varnish and squid against your content and in your environment and then choose the one that best suits your needs. Example: Nginx FastCGI Cache. What’s the difference between NGINX and Squid? Compare NGINX vs. n5iwv, o5z45, cegq, thah, vu20o, 8iyd, 8dgxn, syzq, bznibi, vt40qs,